Get legal help for your business.

Get legal help for your business.

Is a Shareholders Agreement Legally Binding in Malaysia?

Published :

Published :

Jul 8, 2025

Jul 8, 2025

Corporate

Corporate

Governance

Governance

By

By

AKMAL SAUFI MOHAMED KHALED

AKMAL SAUFI MOHAMED KHALED

Running a business with multiple owners in Malaysia? You've probably heard about shareholders agreements but might be wondering: Are they actually legally binding? Do I really need one? These are crucial questions that every Malaysian business owner should understand, especially when dealing with partners, investors, or family members in your company.

A shareholders agreement is essentially a contract between the people who own shares in your company. Think of it as a rulebook that spells out how decisions get made, what happens if someone wants to leave, and how disputes get resolved. But here's what many business owners don't realize: while these agreements aren't mandatory by law, they can be legally binding and enforceable in Malaysian courts when done properly.

The Legal Status of Shareholders Agreements Under Malaysian Law

What Makes Any Contract Legally Binding in Malaysia?

Before diving into shareholders agreements specifically, let's understand the basics. Under Malaysian law, any contract (including a shareholders agreement) becomes legally binding when four key elements are present:

Offer and Acceptance: One party makes a clear proposal, and the other party accepts it without conditions. In a shareholders agreement, this happens when all parties agree to the terms and sign the document.

Consideration: This means each party must give something of value. In shareholders agreements, consideration often includes the shareholders' commitment to invest money, provide services, or follow certain rules about their shares.

Intention to Create Legal Relations: All parties must genuinely intend for the agreement to be legally enforceable, not just a casual understanding between friends.

Capacity: Everyone signing must have the legal ability to enter contracts. This means they must be adults, mentally competent, and not under any legal restrictions.

How Malaysian Law Treats Shareholders Agreements

Shareholders agreements in Malaysia are governed by two main pieces of legislation:

The Contracts Act 1950: This is Malaysia's general contract law that applies to all private agreements, including shareholders agreements. It sets out the rules for when contracts are valid, how they can be enforced, and what happens when they're breached.

The Companies Act 2016: This is the main law governing companies in Malaysia. While it doesn't specifically require shareholders agreements, it recognizes them as valid private contracts between shareholders.

Malaysian courts regularly recognize and enforce shareholders agreements, treating them as legitimate contracts between private parties. However, the courts will only enforce terms that don't contradict Malaysian law or the company's constitution (the official document that sets out the company's basic rules).

How a Properly Drafted Shareholders Agreement Becomes Legally Binding

Essential Requirements for Legal Binding

For your shareholders agreement to be legally binding and enforceable, several conditions must be met:

Legal Capacity: All parties signing must have the legal right to enter into the agreement. For individuals, this means being at least 18 years old and mentally competent. For companies, it means having proper authority through board resolutions or company secretary approval.

Clear and Voluntary Agreement: The terms must be clearly written and understood by all parties. Nobody should be forced or pressured into signing. The agreement should be written in plain language that all parties can understand, avoiding overly complex legal jargon where possible.

Proper Execution: This means following the correct signing procedures. All shareholders should sign the document, preferably in the presence of witnesses. If your company uses a company seal, it should be affixed according to your company's constitution.

Common Risks That Can Make Agreements Invalid

Even a well-written shareholders agreement can be challenged or declared void if certain problems exist:

Fraud: If one party deliberately misleads others about important facts when signing the agreement.

Duress: When someone is forced to sign under threat or extreme pressure, whether physical, economic, or emotional.

Illegality: If any terms require parties to do something that breaks Malaysian law.

Inconsistency with Statute: If terms directly contradict the Companies Act 2016 or other mandatory laws.

To avoid these risks, always ensure all parties fully understand the agreement, have adequate time to review it, and ideally seek independent legal advice before signing.

Relationship with the Companies Act 2016 and Company Constitution

Understanding the Legal Hierarchy

Malaysian corporate law operates on a clear hierarchy that every business owner should understand:

  1. Companies Act 2016 (Top Priority): This is Malaysian law and cannot be overridden by any private agreement

  2. Company Constitution (Second Priority): Your company's official governing document registered with the Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM)

  3. Shareholders Agreement (Third Priority): The private contract between shareholders

How Shareholders Agreements Work Within This Framework

Your shareholders agreement can supplement and add detail to the Companies Act and your company's constitution, but it cannot contradict them. For example:

What's Allowed: Your shareholders agreement can specify that certain major decisions require unanimous consent from all shareholders, even if the Companies Act only requires majority approval.

What's Not Allowed: Your shareholders agreement cannot give shareholders the right to remove directors without following the procedures set out in the Companies Act 2016.

Risks of Conflicting Terms

When terms in your shareholders agreement conflict with the Companies Act or company constitution, Malaysian courts may:

  • Strike out the conflicting terms while keeping the rest of the agreement

  • Ignore the conflicting terms and apply the statutory provisions instead

  • In severe cases, declare the entire agreement invalid

This is why careful drafting is essential. Your shareholders agreement should be reviewed alongside your company constitution to ensure consistency and compliance with Malaysian law.

Is a Shareholders Agreement Compulsory for All Companies in Malaysia?

The short answer is no. Neither the Companies Act 2016 nor any other Malaysian law requires companies to have a shareholders agreement. This applies to both private limited companies (Sdn Bhd) and public companies.

What This Means in Practice

Most Malaysian companies actually operate without formal shareholders agreements. They rely on:

  • The default provisions in the Companies Act 2016

  • Their company constitution (which is mandatory)

  • Informal understandings between shareholders

However, operating without a shareholders agreement exposes your business to significant risks. Without clear written rules, disputes between shareholders often escalate into costly legal battles, and important business decisions can be delayed or blocked.

The Default Statutory Framework

When you don't have a shareholders agreement, Malaysian law provides default rules through the Companies Act 2016. These include:

  • Majority shareholders generally control most decisions

  • Minority shareholders have limited protection

  • Share transfers are usually unrestricted

  • Dispute resolution follows general court procedures

While these default rules work for some businesses, they rarely address the specific needs and concerns of your particular company and shareholders.

Types of Companies Where Shareholders Agreements Are Strongly Recommended

Private Limited Companies (Sdn Bhd) with Multiple Shareholders

If your Sdn Bhd has two or more shareholders, a shareholders agreement becomes crucial. Common scenarios include:

  • Business partners who started the company together

  • Family members who own shares in the family business

  • Employees who received shares as part of their compensation

  • External investors who bought into the company

Without a shareholders agreement, these different types of shareholders may have conflicting expectations about how the business should operate, leading to disputes and deadlocks.

Startups and Growing Companies

Co-founders: When friends or colleagues start a business together, they often assume they'll always agree on major decisions. A shareholders agreement prevents misunderstandings about roles, responsibilities, and what happens if someone wants to leave.

Angel Investors and Venture Capitalists: These professional investors almost always require comprehensive shareholders agreements before investing. They want clarity on board representation, investor rights, and exit strategies.

Employee Share Schemes: If you're giving shares to employees, a shareholders agreement can specify what happens to those shares if the employee leaves the company.

Joint Ventures and Cross-Border Partnerships

When Malaysian companies enter joint ventures with foreign partners, shareholders agreements become essential for:

  • Clarifying each party's contributions and responsibilities

  • Addressing cultural and legal differences

  • Establishing dispute resolution mechanisms

  • Managing exit strategies

Family Businesses Planning for Succession

Family businesses face unique challenges when transitioning between generations. A shareholders agreement can address:

  • How shares transfer to the next generation

  • What happens if family members want to sell their shares

  • How to handle family members who work in the business versus those who don't

  • Procedures for resolving family disputes that affect the business

Practical Market Requirements—Why You May Have No Real Choice

While shareholders agreements aren't legally mandatory, market realities often make them practically essential.

Investor Requirements

Venture Capitalists and Private Equity: These professional investors will almost never invest without a comprehensive shareholders agreement. They require specific protections including:

  • Board representation rights

  • Veto powers over major decisions

  • Anti-dilution protections

  • Tag-along and drag-along rights (mechanisms that protect minority and majority shareholders in share sales)

Angel Investors: Even individual angel investors increasingly expect formal shareholders agreements to protect their investments and clarify their role in the company.

Banking and Financial Requirements

Business Loans: Banks may require shareholders agreements before approving significant loans, especially for companies with multiple owners. They want to understand:

  • Who has decision-making authority

  • How disputes will be resolved

  • What happens if shareholders disagree about the loan

Banking Facilities: For complex banking arrangements, banks may require shareholders agreements to assess the stability and governance of the company.

Government and Regulatory Requirements

Government Grants: Some government grant programs may require shareholders agreements as part of the application process to demonstrate proper corporate governance.

Regulatory Compliance: Certain regulated industries may expect shareholders agreements as part of their licensing or compliance requirements.

Investment Incentives: Programs like Malaysia Digital Economy Corporation (MDEC) incentives may require clear shareholder structures documented in agreements.

Professional and Due Diligence Requirements

Mergers and Acquisitions: Any buyer conducting due diligence will expect to see shareholders agreements. Their absence can reduce company valuation or kill deals entirely.

Professional Advisors: Auditors, company secretaries, and legal advisors may flag the absence of shareholders agreements as a governance risk in their reports.

Insurance: Some business insurance policies may require evidence of proper corporate governance, including shareholders agreements.

Practical Consequences of Not Having a Legally Binding Shareholders Agreement

Increased Risk of Disputes and Deadlocks

Without clear written rules, shareholders often disagree about:

  • Strategic business decisions

  • Dividend distributions

  • Hiring and firing of key management

  • Major expenditures or investments

  • Changes to the business model

These disputes can escalate quickly, leading to expensive legal battles that drain company resources and damage relationships.

Decision-Making Uncertainty

Day-to-day business operations can be affected when shareholders disagree about:

  • Who has authority to make decisions

  • What constitutes a major decision requiring shareholder approval

  • How to break deadlocks when shareholders are equally divided

This uncertainty can paralyze business operations and frustrate employees, customers, and suppliers.

Loss of Investor and Banking Confidence

Funding Difficulties: Investors may view the absence of a shareholders agreement as a red flag indicating poor corporate governance. This can make it harder to raise capital or secure better terms.

Banking Relationships: Banks may be reluctant to provide facilities or may impose stricter terms on companies without clear shareholder agreements.

Market Reputation: In Malaysia's business community, professional investors and partners increasingly expect proper documentation, including shareholders agreements.

Legal and Litigation Risks

Court Battles: Without clear contractual terms, disputes between shareholders often end up in court, where:

  • Legal costs can be enormous

  • Outcomes are unpredictable

  • Business operations are disrupted

  • Relationships are permanently damaged

Statutory Defaults: When courts resolve shareholder disputes without a shareholders agreement, they typically apply the default provisions in the Companies Act 2016. These may not reflect what the parties actually wanted or intended.

Business Value and Market Impact

Reduced Valuation: Companies without proper shareholders agreements may be valued lower in acquisition discussions because buyers see higher risk.

Limited Exit Options: Without clear procedures for share transfers, shareholders may find it difficult to exit the business when they want to.

Reputation Damage: Public disputes between shareholders can damage the company's reputation with customers, suppliers, and the broader business community.

Conclusion

While shareholders agreements aren't legally compulsory in Malaysia, they become legally binding contracts when properly drafted and executed. For most businesses with multiple shareholders, the practical reality is that you'll likely need one to access investment, banking facilities, and professional credibility.

The key takeaway for Malaysian business owners is this: a well-drafted shareholders agreement provides legal certainty, protects all parties' interests, and can prevent costly disputes. Given the relatively low cost of creating a shareholders agreement compared to the potential costs of disputes and lost opportunities, it's usually a wise investment in your business's future.

If you're considering whether your business needs a shareholders agreement, consult with a qualified Malaysian corporate lawyer who can assess your specific situation and draft an agreement that complies with local law while protecting your interests.

Ready to Move Your Business Forward?

Talk to our team.

Ready to Move Your Business Forward?

Talk to our team.

Disclaimer

The content provided on this website is intended for general informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as a substitute for professional consultation with a qualified lawyer. Every legal matter is unique, and you are strongly encouraged to seek tailored legal advice from a licensed legal practitioner before taking any action based on the information available here.

While we endeavour to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the content, ASCOLAW and its affiliates make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability of the information contained on this website. Any reliance you place on such information is strictly at your own risk.

Author

AKMAL SAUFI MOHAMED KHALED

Managing Partner & Founder

Akmal leads Legal That Works and ASCO LAW with sharp commercial sense and digital flair—guiding founders through deals, governance, and automation. He blends law, tech, and strategy to deliver clarity, growth, and real impact for ambitious business owners.

Akmal leads Legal That Works and ASCO LAW with sharp commercial sense and digital flair—guiding founders through deals, governance, and automation. He blends law, tech, and strategy to deliver clarity, growth, and real impact for ambitious business owners.

Practice Area

Commercial

Corporate

Business Function

Corporate

Corporate

Governance

Governance

All rights reserved. © Legal That Works is a legal service by Messrs Akmal Saufi & Co (Registration No. 00020004166). 2014-2025
Regulated by the Malaysian Bar Council under the Legal Profession Act 1976.

All rights reserved. © Legal That Works is a legal service by Messrs Akmal Saufi & Co (Registration No. 00020004166). 2014-2025

Regulated by the Malaysian Bar Council under the Legal Profession Act 1976.